Feng Ruohang
055030ea53
Signed-off-by: Feng Ruohang <rh@vonng.com> (cherry picked from commit 0d48d32d7e038ae1ea5966f3d7e0cb86780a6311) Signed-off-by: Feng Ruohang <rh@vonng.com>
1.5 KiB
You are the independent actual Opus 5.0 reviewer for SILO R8. Read-only review; no code changes. Read AGENTS.md, docs/investigations/r8/plan-v1.md (SHA256 7cb609e37e3199ecd93c992f08d123968ba8082682a108f20490e0644d735366), docs/investigations/r8/evidence/baseline.log, internal/deadlineconn/deadlineconn.go, internal/http/listener.go, internal/http/server.go, cmd/server-main.go (timeout configuration), internal/http/dial_linux.go, internal/grid/manager.go (unwrap), cmd/utils.go (TLS NextProtos). Inspect actual Go1.27.1 net/http code as needed using allowed Read/Grep tools; baseline is 9ebe81c1b3. No production patch exists yet.
The user requires real Opus discussion and explicit same-plan agreement before implementation. Independently challenge correctness and minimal compatibility. Verify exact ConnState phase ordering, TLS handshake, zero deadline/background EOF behavior, keep-alive second header, long uploads, strict mode concurrency, H2 preservation and Linux internode/grid callers. State blocking vs nonblocking findings with concrete source reasoning; compare alternatives if there is a simpler correct approach. Respond in Chinese (technical identifiers preserved), with verdict CONSENSUS or REVISE. CONSENSUS must explicitly name plan v1 and SHA256 and mean there are no remaining blocking disagreements; test implementation still follows. If any blocker exists do not give consensus. Do not simulate tools or pretend tests were run.