mirror of
https://github.com/pgsty/minio.git
synced 2026-08-09 15:53:28 +03:00
fd2ca1c6d2
README, README_ZH, SECURITY, COMPLIANCE, CONTRIBUTING, NOTICE, code_of_conduct, the vulnerability and PR-etiquette documents, the GitHub issue and pull request templates, and the docs/ tree all present Silo as the product. The Grafana dashboards under docs/metrics/prometheus/grafana/ have their panel titles and descriptions rebranded while every minio_* query, label and expression is left alone, so existing alerts and recording rules keep matching. The distinction the review demanded is applied per hit rather than by search-and-replace: - Product and command text becomes Silo and silo: install and run instructions, systemd examples, compose services, download links, badges. - Protocol and interface text keeps MinIO: MINIO_* variables, minio_* metrics, x-minio-* headers, /minio/* routes, .minio.sys, arn:minio, and API field and error names. - Attribution keeps MinIO and gains the fork's own: the AGPL obligations, original copyright, CREDITS and NOTICE stay, with the modification notice added alongside rather than replacing them. - Historical and third-party references are left as facts, not rewritten for brand tidiness. README and README_ZH each carry an explicit non-affiliation notice, document the side-by-side package migration including the /etc/systemd/system/silo.service.d/10-legacy-user.conf drop-in for keeping a legacy UID/GID, and state that recursive chown is never performed. The trademark attribution uses the policy's approved "based on MinIO technology" wording, not the shortened form the policy rejects. github.com/pgsty/minio links are left in place and labelled transitional. The repository has not been renamed, and rewriting them now would produce documented URLs that 404 until the cutover; they change in the cutover commit together with the goreleaser release target, the OCI source label and the raw-content branch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
82 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
82 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
|
|
|
|
## Our Pledge
|
|
|
|
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
|
|
contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and
|
|
our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
|
|
size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience,
|
|
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and
|
|
orientation.
|
|
|
|
## Our Standards
|
|
|
|
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
|
|
include:
|
|
|
|
* Using welcoming and inclusive language
|
|
* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
|
|
* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
|
|
* Focusing on what is best for the community
|
|
* Showing empathy towards other community members
|
|
|
|
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
|
|
|
|
* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
|
|
advances
|
|
* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
|
|
* Public or private harassment
|
|
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic
|
|
address, without explicit permission
|
|
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
|
|
professional setting
|
|
|
|
## Our Responsibilities
|
|
|
|
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable
|
|
behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
|
|
response to any instances of unacceptable behavior, in compliance with the
|
|
licensing terms applying to the Project developments.
|
|
|
|
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
|
|
reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
|
|
that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or
|
|
permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate,
|
|
threatening, offensive, or harmful. However, these actions shall respect the
|
|
licensing terms of the Project Developments that will always supersede such
|
|
Code of Conduct.
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces
|
|
when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of
|
|
representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail
|
|
address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
|
|
representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be
|
|
further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
|
|
|
|
## Enforcement
|
|
|
|
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
|
|
reported to the Silo maintainers through this repository. When confidentiality
|
|
is required, ask a maintainer to establish a private channel before providing
|
|
sensitive details. The project team will review and investigate complaints and
|
|
respond as appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to
|
|
maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
|
|
Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
|
|
|
|
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good
|
|
faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other
|
|
members of the project's leadership.
|
|
|
|
## Attribution
|
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,
|
|
available at [http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4][version]
|
|
|
|
This version includes a clarification to ensure that the code of conduct is in
|
|
compliance with the free software licensing terms of the project.
|
|
|
|
[homepage]: http://contributor-covenant.org
|
|
[version]: http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/
|